Forgot password?  |  Register  |    
User Name:     Password:    
Blog - User Feature   

Slut shame blame game: In court!


On 05/12/2013 at 12:07 AM by BrokenH

See More From This User »

"This is Jodi Arias. She killed her boy-friend. (Supposedly in self defense) Do I need to know about her last XXX-rated tryst with him as well? Does that somehow make her even worse?"

Some of you may know about the Jodi Aria case. Apparently this woman shot and stabbed her boy-friend to death then claimed it was self defense. For the record, I’m not trying to defend Jodi 100% as I do not know all the details. Even if he was an abusive asshole Jodi could have probably handled the situation better. (A break up followed by a restraining order seems to be the best route in my opinion.) However, if he suddenly attacked her in a violent rage with his pain threshold dulled by a drunken stupor she may not have had a better option available to her at that exact moment in time.

What I find fucked up about the court proceeding is they brought up Jodi’s sex life in vivid detail. They asked her what positions she partook in and if her BF referred to her as a slut and a whore. (Apparently he did)   

The first thing I’m forced to ask is what any of this has to do with the murder? It seemed as if such inquiries were done just to humiliate her and the prosecution tried to use her supposed “slutiness” as incriminating evidence against her moral character. (And it worked. She was found to be “guilty” of murder by the jury and actually wants the death penalty for personal reasons.)

Again, I’m not saying Jodi deserves to be let off the hook for the actual crime. May haps she did murder her boyfriend in a jealous rage while he was completely vulnerable. I can only retort with what I’ve learned from the media thus far.

My problem is “slut shaming” was used to make her seem even more like a monster. Why should what she did in the bedroom be yet another negative mark against her? Something about that doesn’t seem fair. It’s not as if Jodi was raping men, raping other women, or seducing under-aged teenagers. As far as I know, she was simply “kinky”. To which my retort is, “who the fuck cares?”

Imagine for a moment being completely innocent of a crime when you are brought up on charges. Let us say unlike Jodi you did not kill anyone, did not verbally make a threat, and did not physically assault anyone. The jerk-bag against you simply wants to have you incarcerated because he (or she) hates your guts for whatever stupid petty reason.

Now imagine the persecution bringing up your sex habits in vivid detail.

“The accused goes to porn sites!”

“The accused screws random males/females at wild parties!”

“The accused has a history of masturbation!”

“The accused dresses in a promiscuous manner!”

“The accused once watched a dirty cartoon of Super-man boinking Power-gurl in her backdoor!”

“The accused has a pair of fuzzy handcuffs!”

“The accused has a thing for tentacles!”

“The accused is a flaming gay guy, nymphomaniac bi-sexual, or a lusty lesbian!”

Even if all this is factual should it be used against you? So long as you’ve never forced sex on anyone against their will and have never engaged in intimate physical relationships with a minor or child, should your sex-life be used to sway the jury to judge you as guilty? If your sex-life has no bearing on the crime that transpired why the hell should it even be brought up?

Regardless, to all those prudes out there ready to pounce on us and judge us for our sexual preferences and our sexual fetishes, let me raise up my big fat middle finger to salute them! A man’s or woman’s sexuality in no way determines if they’re “good” or “evil”. For all of those misguided individuals diluted enough to think virginity and abstinence grants a person superiority over other human-beings please sit on my fist and spin until you get to my elbow. That’s when the ride is over!


"The sorceress,accused of necromancy! If you doubt her guilt simply remember she's sexy too! Sluts are ALWAYS guilty! They're just asking for trouble!"


 

Comments

SanAndreas

05/12/2013 at 12:16 AM

Our legal system does this all the time. Defense attorneys have no compunction about using a complaintant's sex life to discredit their testimony even if the defendant is guilty as fuck, while prosecutors use it to make the accused seem even worse than they are in hopes of getting them a longer sentence. It seems to be a tactic that's especially effective in deeply religious societies like the US and the Muslim countries.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:26 AM

I agree, Andrew. Don't misunderstand me. Jodi should have to pay the penalty for murder. (Assuming it was not in self defense) But the fact she dyed her hair blonde before being brought up on charges and the fact she was wild in the bedroom should NOT be used as additional marks against her. It makes me sick. Justice should stay clean.

Super Step Contributing Writer

05/12/2013 at 12:48 AM

I'm not going to pretend to know any details of the case (I knew it happened, but never paid attention to it), but I agree that even if she is guilty, that should be decided exclusively on facts relevant to the murder, and that sexual activities are not relevant unless it was during sex that the murder occurred, or if it's a rape/molestation trial.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:56 AM

It seemed like her and Travis f^cked like porn-stars and had a bit of a D/s master/slave lifestyle thing going. However, the murder itself was either in self defense (If Jodi is being honest) or it was out of jealousy (according to the persecution). Also no, it was not done during a sex act from what I've gathered.

Aka, the persecution wanted to not only paint Jodi as a murderer but also as a whore. For some reason the American public has less sympathy towards women who are more liberal with their sexuality.

Guess we're still in the Victorian ages,Joe!

Blake Turner Staff Writer

05/12/2013 at 12:50 AM

This is fucking retarded. That is all.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:58 AM

Thanks for the insightful constructive critique, Blake! From it I'll uncover the secrets to blogging excellence in the future! (thumbs up)

Blake Turner Staff Writer

05/12/2013 at 01:22 AM

You're fucking welcome.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 01:27 AM

Bang up fucking job ,sir! Tongue Out

Cary Woodham

05/12/2013 at 12:54 AM

I don't have anything intelligent to say about the subject of this blog, but I will note that I can't wait to play Dragon's Crown. 

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:59 AM

I'd be the warrior or the dwarf. Kicking it Golden Axe style for the win,Cary!

Cary Woodham

05/12/2013 at 01:42 AM

Can you guess who I'll pick?

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 01:45 AM

Amazon,all the way! Thus the holy Golden-axe trinity is complete!

Matt Snee Staff Writer

05/12/2013 at 01:10 AM

That sorceress's boobs are OUT OF CONTROL!  Laughing

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 01:14 AM

Yes, but I bet the skeleton is not complaining. Giggity!

AnonymousJ

05/12/2013 at 02:36 AM

From what little I have heard of the story, he broke it off and she was the one stalking him, though every story has three sides as they say (his/hers/the truth).  That said, it is sad that they use what consenting adults choose to do and try to spin it into a negative reflection on a person as if every "normal" does it missionary with a sheet between them for procreation purposes only.  I suspect the "as long as you're the one doing the pointing, nobody is looking at you" comes into play here.  People often have a tendency to take things they feel guilty about doing and looking at others negatively for it to hide/release their shame.  I still find it weird that our society is so hung up on sex, but violence seems to often get a free pass.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 04:39 AM

I have no doubts she killed the guy. It could have been out of petty jealousy (a lover scorned) but it also could have been Travis wanted to have her on the side too and got angry when she wouldn't put out anymore. (Some guys are selfish pricks like that.)

I agree with you of course. I don't know why violence gets a free pass yet we cannot proudly fly our freak flags without some shrew getting deeply offended.

Jodi should be made to answer for Travis's death but I don't think the court should have played the "harlot card" against her. The trial would have been more fair if that shit had been excluded. Using someone's private sex life to create additional bias against them is dirty pool. Being "kinky" is not a criminal offense.

AnonymousJ

05/12/2013 at 12:56 PM

It is almost at times as if they were putting her on trial for being a "whore" instead of the actuall crime she committed.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 01:01 PM

Yeah, and at least to me "murder" is a serious matter whereas "being slutty" I could care less about. lol. They should have kept to the facts. All that was needed was evidence Jodi was jealous after the break up or that Travis was abusive and controlling. Everything else is inconsequential to what transpired. They could have just stated "Yes, Jodi and Travis were lovers" or "Yes, Travis wanted his cheesecake and to eat it too!". I didn't need to know the two had anal sex and engaged in other "pornographic activities". That's none of my business,really.

Aboboisdaman

05/12/2013 at 10:00 AM

I don't see what her sex life has to do with anything. Unless it's a rape or other sexual crime related trial they shouldn't have even brought that up. I agree with Blake. It's fucking retarded. I can't help but wonder why she wants the dealth penalty though. Did she get life in prison or something?

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:45 PM

No rape to my knowledge. From what I understand Travis broke up with Jodi so either she killed him out of jealousy or he insisted on "off to the side booty calls" even after their break up until Jodi finally said no to him at which point he attacked her & she killed him in self defense.

Aboboisdaman

05/12/2013 at 03:54 PM

This isn't really related to your perspective in this blog, but I looked up some info about this. Apparently she shot the dude in the head, slit his throat ear to ear almost decapitating him, and stabbed him 29 times. That seems a bit excessive for self defense.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 04:12 PM

I thought that too,Aaron. Seems like a crime of passion to me. However, I do know when someone is hyped up on drugs and their perception of pain is dulled by alcohol that they can take repeated stab wounds with nary a stumble. There have been cases in which people have survived a ridiculous number of repeated stabbings too. Apparently we can be as resilient as cockroaches during a nuclear holocaust!

Still, this has "gilded lover" written all over it! She really took out her rage on this poor guy.

 I do believe Travis was reported as being abusive in one of his marriages though so there is that. Certainly I believe she should have stopped seeing the guy but with abusive relationships Stockholm syndrome can come into play.

 One of my hypothesizes is he finally told Jodi he couldn't fool around with her anymore because he wanted to focus more on his present relationship. Jodi probably felt used & hurt so she lashed out excessively.

 The other theory I have is he kept her on the side as his personal "booty call concubine" and might have gotten enraged when she finally told him "Okay,this is the last time."  Maybe she killed him with the gun-shot in self defense but then mutilated his body because he was a total asshole. (However, this is only if the allegations of him being an abusive spouse hold water. Otherwise I'm going with the "fit of jealousy" theory.)

GeminiMan78

05/12/2013 at 11:59 AM

I have not really followed this in too much detail, but I was under the impression at first that it was the defence that brought up all the sex stuff because they were trying to paint as her a victim of sexual abuse. One the the deatails mentioned was that he had tied her to a desk and sodomized her. But if they had this whole s&m thing going and it was consentual, then yeah non of that is even relevant. What two consenting adults do behind closed doors is their buisness, so long as no children or animals are brought into the mix.

But I totally agree with you, none of this should have ever been brought up it was simply just to use as character assassination. What it comes down to was she being abuse and killed in self defence, or was she jealous and killed out out of anger.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 12:40 PM

In a trial like this the only thing I'd care about is evidence she killed the guy and why she did it. Everything else would be unimportant.

In Travis's defense I don't care if he sodomized her (Oh noez,anal sexzorz!) so long as it was willing both ways. Jodi and Travis seemed to have a history of a kinky relationship but the only detail needed is they were lovers. (Aka, just by getting info "they were lovers" I can hypothesize Jodi may have killed Travis out of jealousy. By getting info Travis occasionally seemed controlling and abusive I can deduce Jodi may have defended herself as well from an unwanted advance. Again, what if Travis broke up with her but still wanted to bang her on the side? The miniscule fact she took it in the backdoor from him doesn't effect her credability one way or the other.)

Alex-C25

05/12/2013 at 01:02 PM

Since I live in the deep south outside of US, I hadn't heard the news untill this blog. If what you said might turn out to be true, then yeah, why bring up the sexual life if it didn't have nothing to do with the crime?. This just shows that there are still people living in the victorian age where an ankle was the equivalent of a nude image of a porn site and like they forget that they have penises.

BrokenH

05/12/2013 at 01:14 PM

She either killed the bloke out of jealousy or self defense,Alejandro. Jodi had decent motivation on account he broke up with her but Travis had a history of being controlling too. Most likely Travis really was killed out of a jealous spat but I'm not ruling out the possibility he was banging Jodi on the side too thus leading her astray with the delusion they might have gotten back together again.

Regardless their detailed sex life adds nothing to the proceedings. All we need to know is they were once together and they were passionate lovers. It's easy to fill in the blanks from there,aye?

smartcelt

05/13/2013 at 03:28 PM

Let's see....she's not a preacher...not a politician....not a celebrity...so why is her sex life even an issue? Lawyers pull that crap so often it's just ridiculous. We live in a society of judgemental Puritans at times. What irks me is when you find out the most vocal critics are in fact themselves freaks! They do things that would make Tommy Lee say "Damn,you need help there,my friend!".

BrokenH

05/13/2013 at 10:40 PM

The comments section is the worst, Celt. After you read things like "I hope Jodi gets raped and executed for being a harlot!" or "Die piggy,die!" you realize the majority of the masses can be a miserable lot. Just by them posting stuff like that I'd say they deserve to be "judged" themselves.

I think Jodi should answer for Travis's murder. She says "self defense" but I think it was more of a crime of passion & jealousy. Yet because I was not physically there how can I condemn her to suffering? What if I'm wrong?

Beyond that I don't need to know about Jodi's "anal adventure time" or the fact she dyed her hair blonde before the trial. For me the most important facts are Travis got murdered & that him and Jodi used to be lovers. Going into vivid detail about inconsequential bed-room behavior simply makes the court-room seem like a bunch of jeering perverts. If every judge and attorney  there is so easily excited & repulsed by "sex" maybe they shouldn't have went to law-school in the first place.

Raised_on_Nintendo

05/16/2013 at 03:33 AM

Sadly, I must admit I know more about this case than I should, due to the fact my gf is glued to it.  The absolute bottom line for disclosing such intimate details isn't about whether she is guilty (she admitted it), but to help escape the death penalty by establishing sympathy in the jury's eyes.  That is it.  No shaming going on.  In fact, she seems to enjoy the attention, a d probably has ludicrous fan mail.

Log in to your PixlBit account in the bar above or join the site to leave a comment.