Alexanjdro wrote an awesome blog on the dark and light sides of entertainment. Believe it or not, I actually agree! One of my favorite films was Grave Of The Fireflies and as animated films go it is a very somber affair. As a teen I somehow was able to get into “One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest” and “Dead Poet‘s Society” despite the tragic moments showcased in both movies. Furthermore I concur Attack On Titan is a very good anime. Other macabre favorites of mine include Repo: The Genetic Opera, Devil’s Carnival, Wolf Reign, A Game Of Thrones, Rain-Man, Alice: Madness Returns (game),Silent Hill 2/3,Pan’s Labyrinth, Fisher-King, and Edward Scissor-hands.
I cannot tell you why these particular works resonate with me. Maybe it’s because despite not ending or beginning on an entirely happy note they still came off as sincere and genuine.
But I do think there’s a distinct contrast between the works I referenced in the first paragraph and something like Von Trier’s Nymphomaniac volume 1 & 2.
I’m still under the impression Von Trier wants to throw sex and human indecency in my face to shock me. I find it juvenile on account that all I have to do for that is turn on the news to see the real thing up close and personal. Appalling real life stories? They’re a dime a dozen, take your pick!
There’s a distinct difference when a creator builds something out of sentimentality and sincerity and when a creator builds something out of anger, angst, and the need to get an immediate reaction from the audience. (You could say the second person “tries too hard” and comes off as that much more immature because of it.) Metaphorically the first example is the quiet kid in the back who makes good grades whereas the later is the punk upstart constantly upping his depraved circus act to get the most attention albeit even if it is negative attention. (To the upstart a trip to the principal’s office is a badge of honor)
I realize in the art world there’s that beatnik-ish tendency to shower the upstarts with praise and to go into long ranting soliloquies about their “underappreciated genius”. But I’ve never been able to embrace that seemingly negative “kill the cat on stage” approach .
Can I appreciate darkness? Yes, but only because darkness is much more refined and eloquent than depraved shock value done just for the sake of pissing off the masses.
I’m not trying to imply someone like Von Trier does not have talent but I feel as if he wears his works on his sleeve and acts out in the worst possible way merely to convince us he’s some sort of avant-garde artist who is misunderstood by society. I could be wrong but that’s how the guy comes off to me. Yet at the end of the day it's just an opinion! Maybe there's something spectacular about Lars I cannot perceive with my limited comprehension!
Comments