Yup,and that's probably what they wanted. End-game objective accomplished! I did not bother signing up and responding as I recognized the bait right away.
I much rather give Pixlbit traffic & replies even when I'm talking about another site.
I see, you tease but don't put out! You better show me the goods later! 
I often wonder if these people truly believe what they write or simply know what they write will give them page views. With Bob Mackey I always got the feeling he was less of a social justice warrior and more of a leering troll who just pretended to be a social justice warrior knowing it would piss off certain people. (Thus generating traffic and angry responses)
I hope the same is not true of Kat,James. I always thought she was better than that!
Merely bringing up Rape-lay in the same sentence or same topic as Lords Of Shadow 2 is pretty damning though. I realize Kat meant it's because the Drac scene plays out in a 1st person perspective and that the Rape-lay cover is ALSO a 1st person perspective but would anyone want their game associated with something so morally distasteful? It's an obvious attack and attempt at slander so yeah, I consider it stirring controversy just for clicks. Kat is intelligent so I'm rather sure she knew what would happen when she used RAPE-LAY as a reference.
Don't get me wrong, she's allowed to be offended, Trans. But I am calling her out on the way she expresses her offense. And you're also dead on about vampires. I think a lot of people have forgotten they were originally scary monsters!
We're on the same page. I don't mind Kat was uncomfortable and voiced her opinion. But comparing Lords Of Shadow 2 to Rape-Lay is way over the top sensationalist.
I understand why an interactive first person account of feeding on a helpless family would be jarring. I'm not really angry it made Kat uncomfortable or that she voiced her opinion.
Like you I simply wish we could see the footage ourselves. I also think comparing a game like this to Rape-Lay is a low-blow and even the creator of Rape-lay is quoted as saying Kat's comparison trivilizes rape. (I think it's a spoof but it still brings up a valid point)
I'd have no problem with Kat's article if she had simply left out the Rape-lay comparison. It's very hyperbolic and obiviously meant to damn whatever is associated with it.
Good point,Blake. lol. Kat seems intelligent and well versed in various mythologies so yeah, I'd assume she knows about vampires in one way or another.
Now True Blood could be racy. Especially when the vampires were literally being put into detainment camps and forced to breed under observation for "scentific research". It also implied not all partcipants were "willing".
Yeah, I kind of feel that way too. Dracula is a monster. That's sort of the whole point. Whether feeding for sustenence or feeding for pleasure, violence and a sense of victimization are implied either way.
Honestly in this case I think it was more of a case of "I'm weak and dying....need food NOW!" But even if there's a more sexual feeding later I would not say it would offend me as "this" is Dracula's gig,mate!
I dunno,man. I mean maybe if Dracula expressed some kind of "predatory sexual urge" for the woman. Perhaps if he embraced her and turned her into a vampiress or succubus for his personal pleasure against her will then yeah, I'd say it was symbolic of rape.
But in this case he was weak and popping necks just to regain his strength. It's animalistic instinct to survive at that point. It has nothing to do with "forced sex".
I'm not denying Dracula is a sensual and sexual creature. But I do think there's a distinct difference between feeding for pleasure and feeding for sustenence.
