
From what I've read here, they are atleast on the right track. I am still skeptical, guess I'll know when the PC version is out.
From what I've read here, they are atleast on the right track. I am still skeptical, guess I'll know when the PC version is out.
I don't own Xbox 360 or One, played 1 and 2 on PC, only watched 3 on youtube. But for me Halo is one of my most respected shooters and I don't say that lightly. Its the only shooter besides the original F.E.A.R I play from time and time-again. Was hoping one day I should play 3, 4, 5 and wherever it reaches. Now after reading your article it makes me very sad. I suppose now I will play 3 and stop there. I do wish these publishers let franchises end, the only exception being stand-alone titles. A longer a single story runs the more convoluted and more broken it becomes. Metal Gear was a franchise which was supposed end on a high note and at the end it became something else I regret to ever play. Now its Halo, what's next.
Well after looking at the steam reviews I do see some mentioning issues with the game, but for the majority it works fine or they don't care.
Late, but it came out on PC a few days back if you are still interested. Its on steam and GOG.
Yea, thanks.
OK, got it. There is no pointer stating who you are replying to here, my bad.
Writing wise I felt the game took a step backwards, the first Mass Effect was intriguing, the second asks for too many logic jumps and forgot about the intriguing stuff about the reapers. And Mass Effect 2 had no fem shep walk animations/run animation, it almost killed the game for me. But I must say, the renegade options became pretty badass in 2.
Don't get me wrong, the game was good but I like the first more, maybe cause of nostalgia and some amount of prejudice I had for the second game.
I am sorry you feel offended. As I said, its just my perspective/thoughts don't take it to heart.
And what did the comment above you say, I didn't read it and now its been removed.
I really loved the sands of time trilogy. I thought all the three games, every game played differently while keeping the core, that is the best part of these games. I don't understand why you guys dislike this game, I thought the combat was pretty good compared to the barebones that was in sands of time. The enviroments were awesome, anyway I agree though, the platforming is the best part of these games. And I would really love a remake of this series.
And guys, you really need to manage your time limit, 1 hour 30 minutes is too long and on a game like pop, where there is so little stuff to talk about, it felt bloated and you guys really repeated a lot of things again and again. And your player, I first thought it was an advert. I know I am bitching, but really guys, I love this game, played it like 13- 14 times now but even I have a hard time listening to it for so long on one of my most nostalgic games. Some more management would be good, and try to keep it concise, right now it feels like overhearing a bunch of peoples conversation. If you feel offended then ignore me, I am new here and maybe other people like this format in that case ignore me, I will go back to reading the written content.
And on a side note, I gave up around the 50min mark.
Thank you man finally someone said it, I been wondering what the hell is wrong with everyone, cause this game was goddamn bland as they get. The optional tomb DLCs were the only redeeming part of the game, otherwise its just so bad.
Made an account and bookmarked this site for this sensible article.