Forgot password?  |  Register  |    
User Name:     Password:    
Review   

Call of Duty: Classic Review


See PixlBit's Review Policies

On 12/05/2009 at 11:20 PM by Nick DiMola

The console re-release of the original Call of Duty serves as an opportunity for mega fans to check out the origins of their favorite series.
RECOMMENDATION:

For major fans of the series and those interested to see the roots of the series only.

I remember the release of the original Call of Duty well. It was my first year of college, and at the time, the PC first person shooter scene had gone a bit quiet. The game made quite a splash on my dorm room floor as it was unlike any other shooter available. Though Battlefield 1942 was available and still widely played, Call of Duty offered up a more refined World War II shooter experience.

Since then, the Call of Duty series has grown quite significantly, with the recently released Modern Warfare 2 owning the record for the biggest launch in entertainment history. As one would expect, to earn such a title, the game has become more refined and polished with each subsequent release. With Call of Duty: Classic, console gamers can now experience the original title that kicked off the series.

Players may be upset to learn that the original title pales in comparison to even its sequel, Call of Duty 2. This may or may not be a problem for most players, but for me, the massive step back to the now six year-old game was too much. The Modern Warfare subseries has managed to nearly perfect so many of the concepts put forth here that Classic seems to be nothing more than a history lesson at this point.

As players will quickly notice, aside from the locales and environments, much of the series' core concepts are intact. Shooting down the scope is still necessary for success, missions have a set of objectives that must be completed in order, and a variety of difficulty settings are available to players so that they can tailor their experience to their skillset.

It will also be obvious that the game feels quite a bit clunkier than newer additions to the series. This is due largely to the port from PC, as it substitutes the mouse and keyboard controls for a stripped down set of gamepad controls.

Various other aspects of the game are equally unrefined, but these are due almost entirely to its age. Character animations are rough, the graphics are not the greatest, enemy AI can be extremely poor at times, and mission design is nowhere near the current quality of the series.

The game's multiplayer may be its most redeeming aspect. Those who enjoy the old approach will find themselves right at home in Classic. The RPG elements that made Modern Warfare a massive success have been removed and instead, players will be able to experience the mode's various scenarios with the classic ruleset. This older approach was likely a favorite for many fans of the series at one point, and it's inclusion here allows those fans to enjoy the same Call of Duty style gameplay in a different way.

The problem with Call of Duty: Classic is not so much that it's a bad game, but that it has been outshined by all of the many sequels to it. Basically, players should not be purchasing Call of Duty: Classic for a modern and enjoyable play experience. Rather, Classic should operate merely as a means of experiencing the roots of a fan-favorite series.

Review Policy

In our reviews, we'll try not to bore you with minutiae of a game. Instead, we'll outline what makes the game good or bad, and focus on telling you whether or not it is worth your time as opposed to what button makes you jump.

We use a five-star rating system with intervals of .5. Below is an outline of what each score generally means:


All games that receive this score are standout games in their genre. All players should seek a way to play this game. While the score doesn't equate to perfection, it's the best any game could conceivably do.


These are above-average games that most players should consider purchasing. Nearly everyone will enjoy the game and given the proper audience, some may even love these games.


This is our middle-of-the-road ranking. Titles that receive three stars may not make a strong impression on the reviewer in either direction. These games may have some faults and some strong points but they average out to be a modest title that is at least worthy of rental for most.


Games that are awarded two stars are below average titles. Good ideas may be present, but execution is poor and many issues hinder the experience.


Though functional, a game that receives this score has major issues. There are little to no redeeming qualities and should be avoided by nearly all players.


A game that gets this score is fundamentally broken and should be avoided by everyone.


 

Comments

Log in to your PixlBit account in the bar above or join the site to leave a comment.