PixlBit

Gotcha, thanks.

I think we're talking across each other here. My question is not related to Zimmerman ... like I said, in this instance he chased someone down, so it has nothing to do with what I'm asking which relates specifically to what a gun older is told to do in the case of a home invasion with the intruder in their home.

I've heard that because of some weird laws that could make a homeowner liable for injury to an intruder, that it is legally (I'm not arguing morally so, I'd personally rather just injure or impede) better to shoot to kill. I was just wondering if that was true, or just misinformation, but I can look it up.

So is The Joker. Coincidence? I just noticed the irony in me saying other people look like The Joker.

New Leaf is a lot of people's obsession, so interesting that you are finding it slow. Jak and Daxter sounds like a good time.

Can't say I knew about your most anticipated one at the end there, but it has a cool name!

I wasn't defending him, I'm just legitimately curious about what you're taught to do when you recieve a firearm. This instance would be different than what I was talking about, since he followed the kid against police instruction ... and now that I "type that out loud" so to speak, man does Zimmerman look bad lol; what I'm asking is, I've heard that they tell you to go for a kill shot as opposed to simply trying to injure a home intruder, and I was wondering if there's any truth to that.

About that: I've been told that when you are trained to operate a firearm, they tell you to go for kill shots if say, an intruder invades your home, and apparently this might have something to do with the fact that merely causing injury may make you liable for the intruder's injuries. How much of that is true?

Yeah. I'm an idiot in need of a gun. Need to protect myself from all the other idiots.

Seriously, how did I miss whatever it was, or seriously that picture has a line at the top of those games that starts in June 2012 and ends in May 2013?

Cause if the first one, I'm still not sure what I'm missing, and if the second, yes it has dates on it that are past ...

It's summer, so I'm actually red; and very offended.

Isn't that saying this deal ended in May of this year? I guess I'm missing something.