PixlBit

One of the things that made me the most upset this year was how people over at 1UP handled Mass Effect 3. People over hyped the game and provided non-stop coverage of it leading up. Than once some people were upset with the ending, it became the ONLY big topic on the site for at least an entire month. The review was good, and it seemed pretty fair, but nobody talked about it. Nobody talked about the gaaaaaame from that point on! Every staff article was another one to stir up the pot. There were so many personal blogs from people explaining their hatred for the game, and in no time at all people weren't even talking about a game anymore. People quickly escalated into talking about everything thing they hate on the damn planet from greed, to spooky corporations, DLC, downloads, unfinished games, publishers, the boogeyman, etc.

Over here at Pixlbit it was an oasis, Daries review was great and everybody has been very well rounded on the game. People at 1UP just got upset by one aspect, forgot the rest of the game, and escalated to other topics that no longer had anything to do with their experience in ME3. I haven't played it yet, and once I get ME3 I want all the hype and all the talk to be gone so that I don't have to hear anything anymore lol. I don't want other people's baggage to weigh down my experience.

So many people have legit issues to bag on, but I feel like people focus too much on the negative and don't promote the positive enough. When was the last time somebody did an article about an educational video game, or the fact that Crytek has been liscensing out CryEngine 3 to education institutions, or anything else? We need voices of positivity out here and we need to remind people why this is an amazing art form and needs to be fought over, progressed, and evolved. It's ours. It's our artform, these are our games to design, our stories to tell, we will do with it what we will. I think the future is brighter than it's ever been and I personally believe that gaming has yet to see a "golden age". Retro gamers will hate hearing that and will want to get militant on me as they huck their old systems and rose tinted glasses at me, but I believe it's true. Gaming is young and there's so much more to do here, this is barely getting started trust me.

The visuals and art sound pretty great from what you explained, and it seems like the engine does a good job of bringing it all together and making it run smooth. The physics sound pretty good too. In the Genesis games, Sonic had some weight to him, doing jumps wasn't really instantaneous or "bouncy", and there was a build up as he ran. When I play Sonic 06' he's just like a hollow shell that moves around without any resistance vertically or horizontally, you know? This episode II sounds pretty cool.

Doc, I have to tell you about the fuuuture!

Greatest episode this side of the Mississippi guys. As I listened and made a list out of things to comment on, I realized I was ending up with a list of a dozen things to ramble about and needed to shrink it down. I'm going to keep it clean and cover 3 things. I want to mention what I've been playing, a little about biometrics in game design, and finally what is most important to me in the future of game-design or gaming.

What I've been playing. It's been like a year since the game came out and I've bitched forever to different people about how it was at the top of my "to-buy" list, and now I can finally say I'm playing Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Sadly enough I can't talk as much about it because I just started a couple days ago and I just finished the "boss" encounter at the end of the first real level. It's been a lot of fun and I think it's not only beautiful in presentation, but it's built perfectly for me (for stealth). Esteban Cuevas here at the site has played it a bit and not long ago aired his gripe on Twitter that the game is not a very good shooter, and is definitely a stealth game. So far I have to agree with him.

At the beginning of the first level I told the boss man to give me stealth weapons and I've hardly even had to use those. I've literally sneaked around, searched every nook of the level, choked out several guards, and the only time I ever used my tranquilizer rifle was on purpose just because I was hours into the game and realized I had no idea what it was like to shoot it lol. The levels and gameplay are designed in such a way that it perfectly suits my playstyle, however it lets me know I could change it up if I wanted to. I picked up a machine gun and killed a room of guys one time and it was a much messier, louder, and faster way to get things done, and the cool thing is I didn't get punished for it, but it wasn't fun for me. The fact I have been rewarded for playing any which way I choose has been extremely comforting to me. It's very player-authored and however I play is what my experience is going to be. Somebody who runs and guns is going to have vastly different memories and experiences of the game than somebody like me who sneaks around silent the entire time and stalks every single enemy patiently. I hate when other games try to give you "options" but then they punish you one way or another for each choice. So far Deus Ex seems to reward me for whatever I choose and not bash me for something the game didn't want me to do.

I've also been playing a lot of Elderscrolls, and I'm getting very impatient in my long stoic wait for a Skyrim Complete edition. I'm a massive fan of the series, I started with Morrowind, moved on to Oblivion, and I actually dreamed of having a game set in Skyrim long before Bethesda even revealed that a game based in Skyrim was the next entry (I flipped out when they announced it). I was more hyped for that game than any game in 2011, and Julian was the voice of reason that actually convinced me to wait for a complete edition. I had to sit idly by while everybody either praised the game or shit on it, and after all the hype has died down, I'm still waiting for this thing. I'm trying to keep my wait going though because I know it will pay off. The bugs will be fixed, the patches will be added, the two or so big expansions will eventually be out at some points during this year, and just maybe a complete edition will be out either at the end of this year or sometime next year (I'm hoping sooner than later).

I just started a new character in Oblivion and I'm having a lot of fun with that. You know how Rob said he knew Kirkwall and The Citadel like the back of his hand and he loved how those worlds were crafted? I pretty much know Cyrodiil like the back of my hand. Not only geographically but as a game too. At least the Fighter's Guild quests, Dark Brotherhood, the main quest, all the sidequests, the few Oblivion gate dungeons you come across that get recycled constantly, the in game items, the mechanics, the best ways to level the character I want, the skills I want, race and bonus' I want, etc. It's been like 6 years since Oblivion came out, and there are certainly some antiquated aspects to it that I can do without, but even after all this time and all the 100+ hours I've put in, I can still wander around and be soothed by the amazing orchestral score and look up at the skybox at night and be in awe as the stars shine and the beautiful multiple moons slowly shimmer and move across the sky. I love escapism in my games, I love to get out of my normal life (I obviously don't love my everyday life as much as you guys love yours lol) and live in sombody elses imagination, or in my own. Elderscrolls games are my favorite escapist games on the planet. It's pure and free escapism, in gaming form.

Biometrics in gaming. I loved when you guys brought up the concept and when Patrick talked about having a game find out what gives you those amazing feelings, like when he first played an RPG. I actually want to study biometrics myself, learn to build experiments that can augment playtesting, use equipment and techniques to collect physiological data from players, and analyze that data to see if it can help make better games. Ever since I started getting interested in level design, gameplay design, playtesting, and analysis, I've always wanted to approach it scientifically but I didn't know how, and when I started reading Mike Ambinder's work over at Valve I realized that this stuff can be done and does get done. The science gets done! The science must get done. The science will get done.

Right here is a direct link to the pdf file of Ambinder's 2011 GDC presentation on Biometrics: BioFeedback in Gameplay. If that doesn't work here's a link to the publications page where not only that presentation is available to view, but plenty of other amazing ones: Valve Publications. It's awesome and I study the presentations all the time, even the ones I can't understand like programming. You can read articles and presentations as far back as 1999, for example there's one where Ken Birdwell explains the "Cabal" design process they use, how it works, why it's worked for them, and how they used it to design Half Life 1. They explained it very fairly and openly in detail, and exposed the inefficiencies the process can cause, but how loose and different it is from the typical military hierarchical creative structure most developers have, and how the Cabal ultimately yields superior creativity and better games in the end for Valve's people.

At one of the recent GDCs Gabe Newell (it might have even been during an acceptance speech), of all the things he could talk about, talked a little about how biometrics were very important to the company and 1UP did an article about it with the headline "Biometrics are the future of gaming, say's Valve co-founder" and whatnot. Gabe was fascinated with the kind of tech being introduced by the various motion control/motion detection technologies, the Wii Vitality sensor, and the fact that biometrics could possibly have an impact on design and games. Reading the work of Mike Ambinder you can see that they aren't kidding around, they've been balls deep in this for years now obviously.

In the Biofeedback in Gameplay link I left, Ambinder's slide show, shows what equipment and techniques they use to get physio data, and the pros and cons of each process, anomalies and inaccuracies to expect, etc. He also gives some examples of how some of the data has been used in gameplay already, and how it might be used later in future designs. Just to run through some of it and get it out there quickly, biometrics could possibly lead to having games where your status is monitored by the game and it will react dynamically to you. For example they are experimenting with the Left 4 Dead AI Director they invented for the first two games so that it can use biofeedback to influence the experiences players are having. Depending on the player's status, the difficulty could literally be altered real-time during gameplay (enemy health, weapon placements, boss placements, party members, etc). NPCs could recognize how you are feeling, what state you're in, and respond to you in different ways. Your eyes could be tracked to study where you're looking, NPCs might react to that. The game could study you, estimate your state, and if it thinks you are disengaged from the experience it could attempt to engage you in various ways.

In regards to multiplayer gameplay, they're using biofeedback experiments to see if you could have a system where you could be alerted if your teammate is in distress, or the feedback could affect your matchmaking filters. You could possibly even build an FPS where your eyes are the input that aims your character's vision. He goes on to ask viewers, "If your eyes control the camera it would likely speed up gameplay greatly, so does the speed of gameplay equal a better experience?" He asks a lot of questions, always wants to test, and analyze, he's my kind of guy. That's exactly what I want to do too. He never says that biometrics are the future, and he never says any of the experiments or analysis will lead to better games, he just keeps continuing to do the tests, and the team will find out for themselves based on what the gamers think, and what the results of the constant playtesting loops are. Heart rate, skin conductance level, facial expression and eye movement study, electroencephalography, pupil dilation, blood pressure, body temperature, posture, are all tools that might lead to data that could be informative and lead you to a better idea or solution.

They want to learn more about arousal patterns, what engages players, disengages them, fatigues, energizes, elicits responses and emotions, what's fun, what's not, what players actually do when they play, how they feel. The idea is to hopefully discover optimal arousal patterns for the particular game or situation. They don't have a hierarchy so people don't necessarily fight over who's idea is "better" per se. There are plenty of creative disputes, but they leave it up to testing and see what the science says. They see what works best for the players, which is what matters the most, because at the end of the day when you simplify everything, it's all about making fun games for players, not ego, dominance, or hierarchy. On a side note Michael Abrash, also from Valve, wrote a blog recently about how he is working on "wearable computing", which is fascinating all on its own, and is related somewhat to our discussion, but I won't go on about that particular one.

What I'm looking forward to the most in the future of gaming: Well by then I hope I have at least a degree or school certifications, a portfolio of indie games and mods, and I'm moved to Washington, and sending in as many resumes and doing as many interviews as possible for how ever many years it takes till I have a computer station at Valve or Bungie lol. When it comes to specific design elements that are the most important to me, it's all about animation. I'm not an animator by any stretch, I can hardly draw, but animation is the most important thing to me. I don't want things to look "photo-real", but I want things to be believable. No matter how pretty Crysis 2, Mass Effect 2, or Mirror's Edge are, they all still have that wonky current evolution of animation that we haven't seen advance very much over the years. I agree wholeheartedly with Julian's sentiment about being able to shoot people in the face, but not be able to believably embrace them. When it comes to visuals I will always choose a superior art style over a superior polygon count, so that's easy and doable. Great sound design is doable, challenging AI is doable. No single design element is "unimportant", they are all vital, and there are many things that have to come together to make a gameworld believable and to me the most important of all is animation.

These days it's getting easier and easier to make games "look" right and look amazing, but I've never honestly played a game that really "felt" right. Plenty of games feel amazing, like parkouring in Mirror's Edge, or using aerial faithplates in Portal 2, but I want to play and watch games that feel right and you need animation and collision detection to do that. When I saw Quantic Dream's Kara tech demo a few months ago, the one where the artificial/robotic girl is assembled, becomes aware, talks like a human, cries out and shows fear as she is dissembled I just about cried when I saw that. I believed her performance and felt it. It wasn't some wonky handshake in Mass Effect 3, it was an enormous amount of subtle animations across an entire figure. There's a believable figure executing realistic movements, and my brain instantly analyzes that situation and says, "That seems real, that's elegant." Here's why it's so important. When animation is that good, I don't have to sit back and gawk at how bad it is or how wonky it is, it just feels right and I don't have to worry about it. That's where I want animation in games to get. It doesn't have to be real life, but it needs to be expressive, beautiful, intimate, and dynamic just like real life is.

When I watched that Kara tech demo it felt like we were one small step closer to literally being able to play a video game that was similar to an interactive Pixar production. And fuck guys, do I ever love Pixar and animated movies. WALL-E is my favorite of all time and the level of animation and emotion that ends up in movies like that get me all choked up when I watch them. Games need to do that and I think they will. Animation and collision detection for the wins.

It's cool they're trying it out and taking risks at least, and it's great they're giving you options to choose which versions you want. Before this I've always envisioned a caricature of "Nintendo" as some old Japanese guy with his arms crossed huffing at any ideas other people come up with, and just wants to do things his way or no way, and expects the praise and cash to roll in no matter what he does. Now that they're experimenting and branching out like this, it reminds me they are actual people at an actual business who care about having their jobs intact, want to see what works for them, and move the company forward so they can continue to succeed.

That's a pretty good backlog to have, at least you know you have great games in store. My backlog consists of two different categories: games I own that I need to finish, and games I need to buy. The games I own and still need to finish are:

Deus Ex: Human Revolution (just started it a couple days ago)

Fable 3

Star Ocean: The Last Hope

The games in my backlog that I still need to buy are (this is basically my current priority list of "games-to-buy"):

Dark Souls (I want this so bad it's at the top of the list, and getting it new on Amazon is getting pretty cheap)

Civilization Revolution (can't get enough Sid Meier, and price is pretty low now)

Halo 4 (my most anticipated game of 2012)

Mass Effect 3 (need to finally play it and complete the trilogy my Shep started)

Warhammer 40k Space Marine (is dirt cheap anymore)

Ninja Gaiden 2 (is likewise dirt cheap anymore)

That's my current list of games to buy and play. Now if a Complete edition of Skyrim comes out at any point this year, it will shoot up the list to the top because I haven't played it and I've been waiting patiently for time to go by, for the bugs to be fixed, for expansion packs to come out, and eventually have a complete edition. I've been playing Morrowind and Oblivion again, and trying to bide my time. I'd be surprised if a complete edition never came out, it wouldn't make sense, and I would start a fucking riot I'd be so pissed that I waited so long for nothing lol. They need to just fix Skyrim, put out some expansions, get a complete edition going, and make this shit happen sometime this year.

I started watching the Sess around 2005 when I found out about the show and the network as a whole. It was known as Xplay by then and Webb had been on for like two years, but it was very different from what it is today. I have a lot of fond memories of those earlier days because Sess and Webb looked like slobs all the time and the show was much more campy. They did comedy bits in practically every episode, the sets were much more loungy with furniture, they slipped in a review, and it was just great. It was definitely a gaming show, but it wasn't about previews, demos, gameplay footage, teasers, trailers, and all kinds of the things they have now. In 08 or 07 they changed the setup and tone to be very sleek, clean, less comedy, less cursing, they now stand proper in front of the camera, and nowadays there's much more actual game content lol, but it's just not as enjoyable for me. The Sess was the reason I started keeping up with the show and the network in the first place. He's old enough to be my dad but I relate to him greatly and respect him.

Over the years I've had problems with the network. I respect Morgan Webb, she knows what she's talking about, but she's a bit harsh and I don't always agree with her. I like Attack of the Show but I thought it was going to be a gaming show as well when I first started watching it. It's more of a pop culture and tech show. I like Kevin's personality and humor so he's kind of been an anchor for that show, but there have been co-hosts that come and go which I hated. Like Olivia Munn, no matter how hot she was, I couldn't stand her. They've had a largely male audience and they certainly pander to them. Even with all that said about the network, Sess has always been the anchor that kept me coming back and let me know that somebody respectable and loveable was at the top of the food chain over there and could have his voice heard.

In the past couple years I have been loosing interest in X-Play and I honestly haven't watched it consistently for like two years. Back in the day it was a part of my daily routine, I always made sure I didn't miss it, but now it's just noise to me somehow. The only times I have to watch the show for sure is when they cover GDC or E3. Those events are my superbowl, so I still plan around those events and make sure I catch every minute of G4 coverage that I can, but throughout the rest of the year I'm just transient when it comes to watching X-Play anymore. Now that Sessler is leaving I'm not sure what I'll do about it. I'll check in from time to time to see how Morgan is doing and what they do with their hosting duties and staff.

Even though I've been transient with X-Play lately, the things I do always keep up with weekly have been Xplay's Feedback podcast and Adam's personal video blog called Sessler's Soapbox. Sess use to host the Feedback podcast and he did an excellent job of keeping it on track, voicing his thoughts, letting others voice theirs, and dropping random literary quotes that nobody understood. Sess left the podcast a few months ago and I was pretty sad about it, but I still keep up with the cast because it's still pretty good. It basically seems like Sess has been slipping out of the network for a while and it's been coming in increments.

I just wonder what he has planned, and whatever he has planned, I hope he gets into it quick so I can follow him and keep up with his stuff. He's not only a great and knowledgable gaming enthusiast but he has the writing skill, intelligence, eloquence, and humor to back it all up. He's great in front of the camera, he was their best reviewer IMO, he was a great lead on the podcast, and he interviews developers very well and has a good reputation out there amongst his peers.

My friend Tami over on 1UP has talked about this game alot and it seems pretty interesting. If I had a PS3 I think I'd check this out. My cousin has a PS3 and like his RPGs too, but I don't think he knows anything about Dragoon either, much like myself.

This got me interested in the game, so I've been spending some time reading up on the game as well as looking at other vids online about the gameplay, pawn system, skills, etc. I remember hearing about this game on rare occasions last year but I wrote it off and didn't even want to give it a second look till now. There's so many open world fantasy games and action-RPGs out in the market. We already have Dragon Age, Elder Scrolls, Fable, Dark Souls, The Witcher, etc. So when I heard about this Capcom game giving it's take on the genre(s) I thought, "Why the hell should I care? There's so many good games out there doing this stuff already. We don't need more of it."

Now that I started to do my research and see what the game is actually like, I'm really interested and fascinated. It seems to take many elements from different games and implement them quite well. It looks like it runs smooth, the animation is quite awesome, the character creator has more options than all the other games I've played, the classes look fairly interesting, and best of all, the skills and combat look really fun. I wasn't very kind to this game when I first heard about it. I thought it would be a sloppy mess of wannabe Dragon Age, Elder Scrolls, and Dark Souls ideas that we've all seen before. I thought it would end being a weak attempt by Capcom to enter that type of design, genre, and tone. Little did I know, they appear to know exactly what they're doing. From what I've seen so far, this design and execution looks incredibly well thought out, sophisticated, and more polished than I would've ever given it credit for. Not only am I impressed and must apologize for being so mean to it, but I think I'm getting a bit hyped for the game. I think there's a demo out on XBL, so I'm going to go download it, play it, and see what I think.

So it comes out next month and it's still unfinished? Or maybe the leaked build was just an older build? If it's the former, they must be under the gun and rushing this thing quite a bit. Usually a month from launch is polish time, market time, anything and everything that isn't design. The game should basically be "finished" by now.

 I thought you'd like it Julian because you like the cute things like I do. Your avatar is a picture of a moogle, afterall lol.