oh I forgot about the rhythm game. I should have mentioned that. that was pretty frustrating sometimes.
Yeah I loved playing it too. It has such a great aesthetic and it was a lot of fun and compelling too.
damn man, you're gonna have a retro salad!
did Siri really say that? I need to use that more.
And that Vandepump show sounds... insane.
I have Endless Legend, and I've been meaning to play it, but other things get in the way. But I keep hearing SO many great things about it.
hmmm, I think you've got gigs and ghz confused. Ram always comes in 2, so 1.9 is kind of impossible. I imagine your computer actually has 4 gigs of ram, as it's the common amount these days needed, and i think with less you wouldn't be able to play these games. I think the 1.9ghz is your processing power. But I'm not sure, that's just what I deduced.
Sorry, I didn't do the survey but maybe later man.
yeah I found em on amazon, with some good reviews.
hey thanks for pointing out that Atari Flashback 5. I think I'll pick one up for my older brother for xmas, that would be great. Read some reviews of it and it seems not bad.
I think the only time I really recall being upset about a review was when IGN's Mitch Davis gave Double Dragon Neon a 3. Now, for people who were interested in that game (old Double Dragon fans), most of them liked it. Even if they didn't, well, I wouldn't go so far to give it a 3. A 3 means a broken ass game, and Neon was perfectly playable. He just took out his frustrations on the review in an unprofessional way.
This was a really good blog with a lot of accurate points and well thought out. I look at the scores for the new COD game and I'm like: is it really good and a new thing? Or is it just the typical handout from the reviewers?
anyway, thanks for writing this. I think about this stuff a lot.
cannibalism, from what I've heard. 
