Posted on 09/06/2013 at 11:01 AM
| Filed Under Blogs
Good question. Looking past the fact that one is legal and one isn’t, they are quite similar in that the actual creators of the work don’t get paid either way (at least not directly). But they are different in other ways. The simplest and most obvious reason being that a great deal of the time (although I know there are exceptions) people that sell used games use that money to buy other games, therefore still helping the industry.
But you asked about the moral aspect. I’ve never really thought about it before, so this is kind of the top of my head. This could be a really in-depth and interesting discussion (which I don’t really have time for), but to put it simply, societies have pretty much always ran on trade of goods and services. Trade of used goods still benefits people, whether they are the original creators of the goods or not. The seller can go on and spend that money on something else they want or need, while the buyer gets the goods they want at a (typically) cheaper price. For a (potential) buyer to take themselves out of that equation but to still take the benefits of that society makes it morally questionable, in my opinion.
But in comparison to other things that rank as morally wrong in my mind, pirating games ranks really low on the list. I just wanted to weigh in since I thought this was an interesting question.