Posted on 02/04/2015 at 01:06 AM
| Filed Under Blogs
I see this tendency to re-shape words to serve peoples egos or agendas, especially among gamers. I oppose this. This is not legitimate to me. Origin and intent are important for objective evaluation of anyting, including words and their meaning.
On the other hand, colloquialism. I understand that in casual conversation, using "video game" as an umbrella term is going to happen, even by people who also think that some titles don't qualify according to the strict definition.Magazines used to say things like "electronic entertainment" back in the 80s and 90s. This kind of stuck with me and I use it myself sometimes.
Problem is too many egos are involved, and butthurt ensues, like you've condemned someone on a personal level if you say such-and-such is not really a game. I think way too much value is put into whether something is a 'game' or 'art.'
Btw, I disagree about JRPGs. I think mechanics are meant to be significant in at least half of them. All these different battle systems they have suggests this. I never agreed with the "RPGs are about story meme" that came from the Squaresoft fans.